IP Infusion vs Cisco Nexus, NCS and 8000: a technical comparison

Platform by platform, silicon by silicon: how IP Infusion routers and switches line up against Cisco Nexus, NCS, the Cisco 8000 series and ACI, and what changes in licensing, CLI and operations if you move.

How the two are put together

Both are commercial and carrier-grade, both run the same standards, and both come with SLAs and a global support organization. A router is four layers either way. What differs is who supplies each layer, and whether you can change one of them without changing the rest.

IP InfusionSourced separately, shipped as one system
HardwareEdgecore, UfiSpace, Celestica
Network OSOcNOS-SP or OcNOS-DC
CLIOne CLI across SP, DC, and AI Fabric
OpticsMultiple suppliers, including 400G ZR and ZR+
SupportIP Infusion: one support contract and one RMA path

Different suppliers per layer, qualified together by IP Infusion and delivered as one product on one support contract and one RMA path.

CiscoSourced and shipped as one stack
HardwareCisco
Network OSCisco IOS-XR or NX-OS
CLIDifferent CLIs by line: IOS-XR (SP), NX-OS (DC)
OpticsCisco
SupportCisco TAC

One supplier for every layer, delivered and renewed under one contract.

At a glance

DimensionIP Infusion (OcNOS)Cisco (IOS-XR / NX-OS)
What you buyThe finished router or switch: open hardware, OcNOS, optics and support as one system. Or OcNOS on its own, for hardware you already run.The finished router or switch: Cisco hardware, the NOS and support from one vendor.
HardwareOpen platforms from Edgecore, UfiSpace and Celestica. One OcNOS operating model across all of them.Cisco-branded systems.
SiliconBroadcom merchant: Qumran and Jericho for routing, Trident and Tomahawk for switching.Cisco Silicon One and Cloud Scale, plus Broadcom merchant silicon in lines such as the NCS 5700 and the Nexus 9500 R-Series.
Operating systemOcNOS-SP for service-provider routing, OcNOS-DC for the data center.IOS-XR for SP and core, NX-OS for the data center, IOS-XE for enterprise.
LicensingLicensed separately from the hardware. Perpetual and term, with feature tiers unlocked by software upgrade.Smart Licensing Using Policy, subscription and term. Some lines retain perpetual options.
SourcingHardware and software are bought separately, so platforms can be competed across ODMs.Hardware, software and support are sourced from Cisco.
ProtocolsBGP, OSPF, IS-IS, MPLS, SR-MPLS, SRv6, EVPN-VXLAN, RSVP-TE, IEEE 1588v2. Per-platform detail in the Feature Matrix.Comparable standards-based suite across IOS-XR and NX-OS.
OpticsMulti-vendor pluggables with proven interoperability, including 400G ZR and ZR+ coherent.Cisco optics.
ManagementIndustry-standard transactional CLI with explicit commit. NETCONF, OpenConfig, gNMI/gRPC, YANG, RESTCONF, Ansible, IP Maestro EMS.IOS-XR and NX-OS CLI. Cisco model-driven telemetry and the Cisco automation stack.
SupportOne support contract and one RMA path from IP Infusion, across software and hardware.Single-vendor TAC for hardware and software.

Which one fits your network

The protocol sets overlap heavily, so the decision usually comes down to how you want to buy and operate the network.

Choose IP Infusion when you want
  • Licensing you own. Perpetual and term options, licensed separately from the hardware, so the features you depend on stay a cost you own rather than one you renegotiate at every renewal.
  • Hardware you can compete. The same OcNOS image runs on merchant-silicon platforms from Edgecore, UfiSpace and Celestica, so the box can go out to bid without changing the network OS.
  • Layers that stay separable. Hardware, software and optics are bought on their own merits, so a change of supplier in one does not force a change in the others.
  • Multi-vendor optics. Pluggables with proven interoperability from several suppliers, including 400G ZR and ZR+ coherent for IPoDWDM and DCI.
  • Support from one team. One responsive IP Infusion team backs both the software and the hardware, under a single contract and one RMA path, so a problem does not bounce between suppliers.
Choose Cisco when you want
  • A single vendor across hardware, software and support, with one TAC relationship.
  • Operations already standardized on IOS-XR or NX-OS, with Cisco tooling, automation and processes you intend to keep.
  • Features that live in the Cisco stack specifically, such as an APIC policy model or Cisco-proprietary silicon behavior your design depends on.

One operating model across service provider, data center and AI fabric

OcNOS carries the same industry-standard command line and operational model across three roles that Cisco runs on two separate operating systems. Service-provider routing, the data-center EVPN-VXLAN fabric and the RoCEv2 AI-fabric spine are configured and operated the same way, across the OcNOS-SP and OcNOS-DC editions.

Service provider routing

OcNOS-SP carries BGP, IS-IS, OSPF, SR-MPLS, SRv6 and EVPN-MPLS with IEEE 1588v2 timing on Broadcom Qumran and Jericho platforms. On Cisco this role runs IOS-XR.

Data-center fabric

OcNOS-DC runs a BGP-EVPN-VXLAN leaf-spine with the standard overlay primitives on Broadcom Trident and Tomahawk hardware. On Cisco this role runs NX-OS.

AI fabric

OcNOS-DC adds RoCEv2 lossless queueing on Broadcom Tomahawk-5 800G spines for GPU-cluster fabrics. On Cisco this role runs on Nexus (NX-OS) or Cisco 8000 (IOS-XR).

The same command line and configuration patterns carry across all three roles on IP Infusion. On Cisco, service-provider and core routing run IOS-XR and the data center runs NX-OS, each with its own command line and configuration model, so a team moving between the two roles works in a different syntax and operational model.

Platform-by-platform: Service Provider Routers

Rows are matched on role, port profile and capacity, not SKU for SKU. Each row pairs a Cisco platform with its IP Infusion equivalent, the port profile, the capacity comparison and the verdict. Where one platform does not carry the capacity, the row says so and names the combination that does.

Role, ports and capacity all line up Same capacity class Design review
Cisco platform IP Infusion equivalent Ports Capacity Match Notes
Cisco NCS 540Access / aggregation · IOS-XR S9510-28DC / AS7535-28XBOcNOS-SP 24×10G + 8×25G + 2×100G → 24×25G + 2×100G + 2×400G ~640G → 800G Role and capacity match Cisco does not publish the forwarding ASIC for the NCS 540, so this row is matched on role, port profile and capacity rather than on silicon.
Cisco NCS 5500 / 5700Aggregation / provider edge · IOS-XR S9600-64X / 56DX / AS9947-36XKBOcNOS-SP 24×100G + 6×400G → 48×100G + 8×400G 3.6T-4.8T → 4.8T-7.2T Same capacity class Route scale, buffer depth and port mix are compared per deployment.
Cisco 8000 (8201 / 8202)Core / peering · IOS-XR · Cisco Silicon One Q100 S9610-36DOcNOS-SP 12×100G + 24×400G → 36×400G 10.8T → 14.4T Different silicon The silicon architectures differ, so buffer depth, FIB/RIB scale and label-stack depth are compared per deployment rather than assumed.
Cisco ASR 9902 / 9903PE / BNG edge · IOS-XR S9600-56DX / AS9947-36XKBOcNOS-SP 48×100G + 8×400G By configuration BNG to confirm Advanced subscriber-management workloads are scoped as a design review rather than a datasheet swap.

Platform-by-platform: Data Center Switches

The same OcNOS-DC image, the same standards-based EVPN-VXLAN fabric, on open Broadcom Trident and Tomahawk hardware.

Cisco platform IP Infusion equivalent Ports Capacity Match Notes
Cisco Nexus 93180YC-FX25G leaf · NX-OS · Cloud Scale AS7326-56XOcNOS-DC 48×25G + 6×100G → 48×25G + 8×100G 1.8T → 2.0T (one way) Port-for-port match BGP-EVPN-VXLAN, MAC-VRF and the standard overlay primitives are supported natively.
Cisco Nexus 9336C-FX2100G leaf / spine · NX-OS · Cloud Scale AS7726-32X / S9110-32XOcNOS-DC 36×100G → 32×100G 3.6T → 3.2T (one way) Same 100G class Where 400G uplinks are wanted instead, the AS9716-32D row below is the better starting point.
Cisco Nexus 9332D-GX2B400G leaf / spine · NX-OS · Cloud Scale AS9716-32D / AS9736-64DOcNOS-DC 32×400G → 32 or 64×400G 12.8T → 12.8 or 25.6T Same 400G class Both carry BGP-EVPN-VXLAN with the standard overlay primitives.
Cisco 800G spine51.2T tier · Cisco Silicon One G200 AIS800-64D / S9321-64EOcNOS-DC 64×800G → 64×800G 51.2T → 51.2T Different vendor silicon RoCEv2 lossless queueing for AI fabric is available on the Tomahawk-5 platforms.
Cisco Nexus 9500 R-SeriesDeep-buffer spine · NX-OS · Broadcom ASICs S9610-36D / AS9947-36XKBOcNOS-SP 36×400G / 24×100G + 12×400G By chassis → 14.4T / 7.2T Deep buffer sits in SP On the IP Infusion side the GB-scale buffer platforms are the Jericho2c+ routers (16 GB on the S9610-36D, 8 GB HBM on the AS9947-36XKB), and those run OcNOS-SP. A deep-buffer aggregation role is therefore scoped as an SP-family design rather than a like-for-like DC switch swap.
Cisco ACI / APICController-based DC fabric EVPN-VXLAN leaf-spineOcNOS-DC Per fabric design Design review The APIC controller and its policy model do not port one-to-one, so a move is scoped as a design review rather than a swap.

How to read these. Rows are matched on role, port profile and capacity. Capacity is stated one way on both sides: Cisco publishes Nexus switching capacity bidirectionally, so those figures are halved here to compare against the unidirectional figures Edgecore and UfiSpace publish. Silicon is named only where the vendor names it; Cisco does not publish the forwarding ASIC for the NCS 540, and describes the Nexus 9500 R-Series as Broadcom ASICs without naming the part. No SKU is presented as a guaranteed one-to-one replacement, and the right platform for your network still depends on its port mix, scale and feature set. Specs reflect publicly documented information as of July 2026.

Platforms IP Infusion ships for these roles

A representative set for the roles above. Open any card for the platform datasheet:

Browse the full validated set: Hardware Compatibility List.

Where IP Infusion replaces Cisco well

SP metro & edge aggregation

SR-MPLS, EVPN-MPLS and G.8273.2 Class C timing on Broadcom Qumran and Jericho platforms, covering the access and aggregation roles the Cisco NCS 540 and NCS 5500 serve.

Data-center EVPN-VXLAN leaf-spine

A BGP-EVPN-VXLAN fabric on open Trident and Tomahawk hardware, with the standard overlay primitives (MAC-VRF, type-2/type-5 routes) and no central controller dependency.

400G & 800G data-center spine

High-radix spines on Broadcom Tomahawk-4 (400G) and Tomahawk-5 (800G), with RoCEv2 lossless queueing for AI fabric.

IPoDWDM & 400G coherent DCI

OpenZR+ 400G coherent pluggables managed directly from OcNOS-SP: transponder-free DCI on open hardware, with proven multi-vendor optics interoperability.

Operators who made the move

Published customer stories where Cisco equipment was replaced, and the reason each operator gave:

A phased migration path

Week 1

Assessment & lab

Capture the current IOS-XR / NX-OS config, port mix, and feature usage; map platforms against the classes above and select OcNOS editions and HCL hardware.

Week 4

Pilot & parity

Run a dual-homed pilot, verify protocol and timing parity, translate route-policy and EVPN config, and stream OpenConfig telemetry to your existing collector.

Week 12

Rolling cutover

Cut over region by region with a clear rollback path, retaining the same standards-based data plane and operational model throughout.

Where IP Infusion fits

Cisco is a mature incumbent with a deep portfolio and a support organization to match. IP Infusion competes on procurement: merchant-silicon hardware you can compete across ODMs, software licensed separately from the box and available perpetually, and optics from more than one supplier, delivered as a finished router or switch validated on the HCL. Where your requirement is the standards-based protocol set, that is the trade worth pricing.

Cisco, IOS-XR, IOS-XE, NX-OS, Silicon One, Nexus, Catalyst, NCS, Cisco 8000, ACI, and APIC are trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Broadcom and its product names are trademarks of Broadcom Inc. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. IP Infusion is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cisco Systems. Comparisons reflect publicly documented specifications as of July 2026 and are provided for evaluation purposes only.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Does IP Infusion sell complete switches and routers, or just the OcNOS software?
Both. The main offering is the finished product: a carrier-grade router or switch with OcNOS pre-installed on open hardware, plus the optics and the support contract, delivered as one system and validated on the Hardware Compatibility List. If you already run open hardware, you can license OcNOS on its own for it. Because hardware, software and optics stay separable, you can change any one of them later without replacing the others.
Is IP Infusion a Cisco alternative?
Yes. IP Infusion supplies routers and switches for the same service-provider and data-center roles Cisco serves, built on open Broadcom merchant-silicon platforms, running the commercial OcNOS network operating system, with vendor support and SLAs. The practical difference is procurement: the hardware is competed across ODMs and the software is licensed separately from it.
Can OcNOS replace Cisco IOS-XR for service-provider routing?
At the protocol layer OcNOS-SP carries the stack SP networks run on Cisco IOS-XR: BGP, IS-IS, OSPF, MPLS, SR-MPLS, SRv6, RSVP-TE, L2VPN/L3VPN, QoS, and IEEE 1588v2 timing. Whether a specific Cisco platform maps one-to-one depends on your port mix, scale, and feature usage, so a production swap is validated with an IP Infusion engineering assessment against the Feature Matrix and Hardware Compatibility List.
What is the difference between OcNOS and Cisco NX-OS in the data center?
Both run EVPN-VXLAN leaf-spine fabrics with the same overlay primitives. NX-OS runs on Cisco Nexus hardware; OcNOS-DC runs on open Broadcom Trident and Tomahawk platforms from several manufacturers. The difference is the hardware model rather than the fabric design.
Does OcNOS run on the same silicon as Cisco?
Partly, and that is the point. OcNOS standardizes on Broadcom merchant silicon (Qumran, Jericho, Trident, Tomahawk). Cisco uses its own Silicon One and Cloud Scale ASICs across much of its portfolio, but also ships Broadcom merchant silicon in lines such as the NCS 5700, where Cisco states a single 4.8-Tbps Jericho 2 ASIC, and the Nexus 9500 R-Series. That shared merchant-silicon base is what makes multi-vendor hardware sourcing practical.
Is there an OcNOS equivalent to the Cisco Nexus 9300?
For the data-center leaf role, OcNOS-DC runs on Broadcom Trident-class platforms (for example an Edgecore 48×25G switch with 100G uplinks) with BGP-EVPN-VXLAN, MAC-VRF and the standard overlay primitives. The exact match depends on your port and uplink profile, which the assessment maps against the Hardware Compatibility List.
Can OcNOS replace a Cisco ACI EVPN-VXLAN fabric?
Cisco ACI is a controller-based fabric managed by the APIC. OcNOS-DC runs a BGP-EVPN-VXLAN leaf-spine on open hardware with the same overlay primitives and no central controller. The two share the VXLAN/EVPN data plane, but the APIC policy model is not a one-to-one feature port, so a move is scoped as a design review rather than a swap.
What is the OcNOS alternative to the Cisco 8000 or NCS series for SP core?
OcNOS-SP runs on open compact-core platforms (for example the UfiSpace S9600 and S9610 families on Broadcom Qumran-2C and Jericho-2C+ silicon) for core and peering, and on Qumran-class access routers for the NCS 540 role. Where the Cisco platform uses Silicon One, it is a throughput-class match on different silicon; where Cisco already uses Broadcom, it is the same silicon generation. Buffer depth, FIB/RIB scale and label-stack depth are compared per deployment.
How do Cisco IOS-XR and NX-OS commands map to OcNOS?
OcNOS uses an industry-standard command line that is transactional with an explicit commit, close in feel to IOS-XR, so most BGP, IS-IS, OSPF, MPLS, interface and EVPN configuration patterns translate directly. Exact syntax differs in places, so a migration uses a command mapping and a reviewed translation pass rather than a line-by-line port.
Can one team run service provider, data center and AI fabric on IP Infusion?
Yes. OcNOS uses the same industry-standard command line and operational model across service-provider routing on OcNOS-SP and the data-center EVPN-VXLAN fabric and RoCEv2 AI-fabric spines on OcNOS-DC, so the same configuration patterns and tooling carry across all three roles. On Cisco those roles span two operating systems, IOS-XR for service-provider and core routing and NX-OS for the data center, each with its own command line and configuration model.
Is OcNOS supported the way Cisco is?
Yes. OcNOS is a commercial product with SLAs and a global support organization behind it, not a community project. Support is not the difference between the two; the hardware model is.
How long has IP Infusion been building network operating system software?
Since the late 1990s. OcNOS is built on ZebOS, the commercial embedded routing stack IP Infusion has developed and shipped for more than two decades and licensed as routing software across the networking and security industry. Its routing lineage traces back to the Zebra routing project originated by the founders of IP Infusion. OcNOS-SP and OcNOS-DC are the carrier-grade operating systems built on that code base, so the protocol stack behind them carries a long field history rather than a recent one.
Is OcNOS proven enough for a production carrier or data-center network?
Yes. OcNOS runs in production service-provider and data-center networks worldwide, on a routing control plane with more than two decades of field history through its ZebOS heritage. It is a commercial, supported product with its own engineering, QA and release process. For a specific network the deployment is validated against the Feature Matrix and Hardware Compatibility List, so the match to your roles, scale and feature usage is confirmed before cutover rather than assumed.
Why replace proprietary routers with open networking?
It separates the hardware, the network OS and the optics so each can be sourced on its own merits, and it keeps software licensing you own rather than renegotiate at renewal. IP Infusion supplies the result as a finished, validated system, so that sourcing freedom does not turn into an integration project.
Is IP Infusion an alternative to Juniper, Arista and Nokia as well as Cisco?
Yes. IP Infusion competes across proprietary routing and switching generally. The same OcNOS platforms that cover Cisco IOS-XR and NX-OS roles also cover Juniper Junos platforms in service-provider and data-center networks. For a platform-by-platform Junos view, see the Juniper comparison at /resources/ocnos-vs-juniper/.